In the past, playing with on-chain interactions felt like using "Excel with a black skin"; it was powerful and well-structured, but the process was extremely user-unfriendly. Clicking around, the flow was rigid, and not only that, I had to follow the route designed by the developers step by step, which was nothing like "What do I want to do?" but more like "What am I allowed to do?"

The core idea of Anoma is particularly simple: it's not about you running the process, but rather you stating "what you want to do," and leaving the rest to the network to match on its own.

You don't need to preset processes or go through a bunch of steps to interact with contracts; just state your "intent" (intent), for example, "I want to donate 100 USDC to a carbon-neutral DAO." Then the network will automatically find other intents that match yours—like someone wanting to exchange ETH for USDC, and someone else wanting to fund a public welfare project. #yap # kaito

The demands of the three parties are matched into a complete transaction, completed in one go, allowing for collaboration without trust. There are no UI process restrictions, and developers do not need to predefine complex logic. It is like "on-chain barter," and it is automated, programmable, and atomic.

In my opinion, Anoma is essentially a new interaction paradigm, not a chain, not a protocol, but a system where "everyone can express intentions, and the network collaborates automatically."

What this represents is a very radical idea: Web3 is no longer a process set by programmers where users just "click, click, click", but rather users express their thoughts, and the chain helps you get it done.